Data year: 2025
The SPED Support Score (0 to 100) measures how well a school supports students in special education across six components. The percentile compares that score with other Texas schools at the same grade level: a school at the 90th percentile scored higher than about 90% of them.
Schools ranked by special education support
| Rank | School | Percentile | SPED Support Score | Academic Performance | Academic Growth | Inclusion & Placement | Staffing Support | Discipline Climate | Graduation & Dropout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LEE H S High · 09 - 12 | 82.9% | 48.5/100 | 17.9 | 49.4 | 24.4 | 56.8 | 59.9 | 85.8 |
| 2 | GOOSE CREEK MEMORIAL High · 09 - 12 | 82.0% | 48.4/100 | 14.9 | 51.0 | 24.9 | 60.8 | 51.7 | 83.5 |
| 3 | STUART CAREER TECH H S High · 09 - 12 | 76.9% | 47.6/100 | 18.0 | 51.8 | 54.1 | 39.4 | 80.8 | 71.4 |
| 4 | CROCKETT EL Elementary · KG - 05 | 53.6% | 36.7/100 | 17.9 | 52.8 | 9.4 | 51.4 | 83.0 | — |
| 5 | STERLING H S High · 09 - 12 | 45.2% | 44.5/100 | 14.7 | 48.6 | 17.7 | 44.1 | 58.4 | 86.9 |
| 6 | BANUELOS EL Elementary · KG - 05 | 40.9% | 36.0/100 | 36.4 | 45.8 | 7.7 | 49.1 | 79.2 | — |
| 7 | DE ZAVALA EL Elementary · KG - 05 | 40.9% | 36.0/100 | 32.7 | 37.6 | 9.4 | 47.4 | 90.3 | — |
| 8 | JAMES BOWIE EL Elementary · EE - 05 | 40.9% | 36.0/100 | 31.7 | 35.7 | 8.2 | 59.1 | 85.7 | — |
| 9 | JESSIE LEE PUMPHREY EL Elementary · EE - 05 | 30.9% | 35.4/100 | 15.7 | 52.0 | 18.6 | 38.8 | 91.2 | — |
| 10 | CARVER EL Elementary · EE - 05 | 24.6% | 35.0/100 | 31.9 | 45.7 | 9.4 | 40.0 | 80.9 | — |
| 11 | ASHBEL SMITH EL Elementary · EE - 05 | 23.4% | 34.9/100 | 32.9 | 41.2 | 8.3 | 49.9 | 86.5 | — |
| 12 | CLARK EL Elementary · KG - 05 | 20.7% | 34.7/100 | 17.2 | 50.3 | 6.5 | 45.5 | 85.7 | — |
| 13 | HORACE MANN J H Middle · 06 - 08 | 20.1% | 38.0/100 | 13.8 | 41.7 | 9.6 | 61.7 | 49.0 | 29.3 |
| 14 | HARLEM EL Elementary · KG - 05 | 16.9% | 34.4/100 | 11.2 | 50.4 | 8.5 | 43.9 | 91.3 | — |
| 15 | LAMAR EL Elementary · KG - 05 | 16.9% | 34.4/100 | 13.7 | 42.8 | 8.7 | 49.2 | 85.2 | — |
| 16 | STEPHEN F AUSTIN EL Elementary · PK - 05 | 16.9% | 34.4/100 | 19.4 | 49.7 | 7.0 | 47.9 | 83.8 | — |
| 17 | TRAVIS EL Elementary · KG - 05 | 16.9% | 34.4/100 | 12.2 | 44.6 | 7.6 | 52.4 | 92.2 | — |
| 18 | VICTORIA WALKER EL Elementary · KG - 05 | 15.9% | 34.3/100 | 21.9 | 52.3 | 5.6 | 44.1 | 87.0 | — |
| 19 | SAN JACINTO EL Elementary · EE - 05 | 14.1% | 34.1/100 | 15.1 | 49.0 | 9.3 | 41.8 | 81.0 | — |
| 20 | BAYTOWN J H Middle · 06 - 08 | 11.1% | 36.6/100 | 13.9 | 45.1 | 19.4 | 44.2 | 48.4 | 29.0 |
| 21 | HIGHLANDS J H Middle · 06 - 08 | 11.1% | 36.6/100 | 13.7 | 40.8 | 11.9 | 51.1 | 56.1 | 27.3 |
| 22 | GENTRY J H Middle · 06 - 08 | 9.1% | 36.3/100 | 14.6 | 45.2 | 11.7 | 43.7 | 63.8 | 27.2 |
| 23 | E F GREEN JUNIOR SCHOOL Middle · 06 - 08 | 8.2% | 36.1/100 | 13.1 | 45.6 | 8.0 | 46.5 | 67.6 | 26.2 |
| 24 | CEDAR BAYOU J H Middle · 06 - 08 | 6.2% | 35.6/100 | 14.5 | 45.0 | 11.4 | 43.9 | 53.1 | 26.6 |
| 25 | HIGHLANDS EL Elementary · 01 - 05 | 2.3% | 32.1/100 | 15.5 | 43.5 | 7.0 | 38.2 | 80.9 | — |
| 26 | ALAMO EL Elementary · EE - 05 | 1.1% | 31.5/100 | 15.0 | 50.9 | 7.8 | 27.3 | 83.2 | — |
Sub-scores are out of 100. A dash means the component does not apply or was not reported for that school.
Other schools in this district
These schools are not ranked, usually because they serve too few special education students to score reliably or are a specialized program.
| School | Grades | Why not ranked |
|---|---|---|
| EXCEL ACADEMY (MURWORTH) | 08 - 12 | Fewer than 10 special education students |
| GCCISD VIRTUAL ACADEMY | 01 - 12 | Virtual School |
| HIGH POINT SCHOOL | 06 - 12 | Fewer than 10 special education students |
| HOPPER PRI | EE - KG | Not enough data to score |
| IMPACT EARLY COLLEGE H S | 09 - 12 | Not enough data to score |
| PETER E HYLAND CENTER | 10 - 12 | Not enough data to score |
| POINT ALTERNATIVE CENTER | 06 - 12 | Alternative Education Program |
| SHEILA LILES EARLY LEARNING ACADEMY | EE - PK | Not enough data to score |
Special education students by disability
| School | Special Education Students | Autism | Behavioral | Intellectual | Non-categorical Early Childhood | Physical |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEE H S | 315 | 42 | 47 | 182 | 0 | 16 |
| GOOSE CREEK MEMORIAL | 286 | 21 | 51 | 199 | 0 | 4 |
| STUART CAREER TECH H S | 79 | 7 | 18 | 42 | 0 | 0 |
| CROCKETT EL | 90 | 26 | 8 | 34 | 1 | 32 |
| STERLING H S | 346 | 33 | 55 | 194 | 0 | 4 |
| BANUELOS EL | 133 | 24 | 21 | 50 | 3 | 25 |
| DE ZAVALA EL | 90 | 22 | 13 | 33 | 2 | 21 |
| JAMES BOWIE EL | 119 | 20 | 11 | 47 | 3 | 25 |
| JESSIE LEE PUMPHREY EL | 110 | 14 | 1 | 39 | 13 | 32 |
| CARVER EL | 91 | 18 | 16 | 34 | 1 | 21 |
| ASHBEL SMITH EL | 117 | 17 | 4 | 33 | 8 | 53 |
| CLARK EL | 175 | 29 | 20 | 78 | 3 | 24 |
| HORACE MANN J H | 136 | 4 | 17 | 87 | 0 | 15 |
| HARLEM EL | 111 | 7 | 22 | 40 | 0 | 20 |
| LAMAR EL | 105 | 32 | 8 | 34 | 2 | 12 |
| STEPHEN F AUSTIN EL | 156 | 26 | 21 | 53 | 2 | 41 |
| TRAVIS EL | 135 | 24 | 16 | 46 | 2 | 21 |
| VICTORIA WALKER EL | 218 | 47 | 10 | 77 | 5 | 30 |
| SAN JACINTO EL | 92 | 30 | 3 | 33 | 7 | 25 |
| BAYTOWN J H | 141 | 5 | 26 | 79 | 0 | 1 |
| HIGHLANDS J H | 174 | 12 | 33 | 112 | 0 | 5 |
| GENTRY J H | 177 | 22 | 34 | 92 | 0 | 3 |
| E F GREEN JUNIOR SCHOOL | 201 | 33 | 15 | 100 | 0 | 2 |
| CEDAR BAYOU J H | 191 | 21 | 26 | 112 | 0 | 9 |
| HIGHLANDS EL | 205 | 30 | 25 | 97 | 0 | 55 |
| ALAMO EL | 129 | 18 | 20 | 47 | 2 | 26 |
| HOPPER PRI | 39 | 18 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 21 |
| IMPACT EARLY COLLEGE H S | 11 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| PETER E HYLAND CENTER | 11 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| POINT ALTERNATIVE CENTER | 20 | 0 | 8 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| SHEILA LILES EARLY LEARNING ACADEMY | 38 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 15 |
How this page was made
All figures come from 2025 Texas Education Agency data. Schools are ranked by SPED Support Percentile, which compares each school only with schools at the same grade level, then by SPED Support Score. District totals add up every school that reported the figure, and the student-to-teacher ratio divides special education students by special education teachers (full-time equivalent) across the schools that report teachers. Read the full scoring methodology.